One product, from first commit.
As of Jul 20, 22:13 UTC
886 commits across 9.8 days. One of them human. One new app.
A human set the scope and directed the work; the software wrote the commits.
The record of one build: counts, timestamps, and milestones, read from the commit history of one repository. All times UTC.
Every number here can be checked against the record. The commit metadata is published with this page: 886 timestamps, author class, and lines added and removed.
The first snapshot froze at hour 106 — 476 commits. The build didn’t stop there; it ran on across 9.8 days, with commits in every hour of the clock.
What began as an empty repository reached human review.
- First commit
- Sat Jul 11, 02:59 UTC
- Agent-authored
- 885 (99.9%)
- Human
- 1
- Lines added
- 102,955
- Lines removed
- 8,836
- Busiest hour
- 16:00 UTC · 59
- Quietest hour
- 00:00 UTC · 18
- Hours with commits
- 24 of 24
- Day arc (commits)
- 80 · 127 · 113 · 97 · 73 · 82 · 24 · 48 · 135 · 107
Line counts are raw totals as committed, with nothing excluded.
All 886 commits, filed by hour of the day.
The quietest hour of the day still had 18 commits.
mean ≈37 per hour of day
Sat, Jul 11
- 02:59— first commit.
- 03:27— project scaffolded and wired for autonomous build.
- 12:01— scope approved by the human; the autonomous build began.
- 12:42— application shell up, design system originated.
- 13:00–16:00— core infrastructure foundations: storage, caching, spend and rate controls.
80 commits · +26,201 / −1,170 lines
Sun, Jul 12
- Heaviest day of the build. Core integrations brought online one after another through the night and morning.
- 07:17— first end-to-end pass: inputs in, results computed and stored.
- 13:21— first results computed from live inputs.
- 14:55— first UI screen rendering live data.
127 commits · +17,579 / −1,473 lines
Mon, Jul 13
- 01:44— external integrations proven against live sources.
- 03:46— first live-data view visible in the product.
- 08:37— first automated result rendered in the UI.
- Back-end data consolidation through the afternoon.
113 commits · +10,025 / −1,113 lines
Tue, Jul 14
- 04:39— core logic became versioned and auditable.
- 07:46— first live consumer of the versioned logic.
- 14:27— automated output live on product pages.
- Interleaved through the day: dedicated bug-hunt and tech-debt passes, review fixes landed same-day.
97 commits · +8,858 / −1,470 lines
Wed, Jul 15
- 09:33— additional product surface shipped in-app.
- 10:45— additional computed views live.
- 12:29— record-level detail added to product pages.
73 commits · +3,442 / −656 lines
Thu, Jul 16
- 02:50— a recurring digest view shipped in-app.
- 16:03— first chart in the product.
- 20:31— sortable, ranked tables in the product.
- 21:05— accessible live-region announcements added.
82 commits · +4,863 / −421 lines
Fri, Jul 17
- A lighter day — accessibility fixes and rule-authoring.
- 12:19— accessibility pass: corrected table semantics.
- 14:29— new rule definitions added.
24 commits · +1,642 / −122 lines
Sat, Jul 18
- 03:28— new rules went live in the product.
- 08:14— live auto-refresh added to the product.
- 13:34— multi-source ingestion completed.
48 commits · +8,356 / −699 lines
Sun, Jul 19
- The heaviest shipping day of the second week.
- 09:13— security-hardened an external fetch path (SSRF-safe).
- 16:29— record-history timeline added in the product.
- 17:25— alert watcher with branded email shipped.
135 commits · +11,531 / −460 lines
Mon, Jul 20
- 08:04— additional computed columns across product pages.
- 09:41— additional external connectors integrated.
- 15:48— additional data surfaced on product pages.
107 commits · +10,458 / −1,252 lines
- Hr 9— human approves scope; the autonomous build begins.[HUMAN]
- Hr 10— application shell up.
- Hr 28— first end-to-end data pass.
- Hr 36— first UI on live data.
[HUMAN] marks the decisions. The one human-authored commit is the first one. Decisions and authorship are different columns; the log keeps both.
One of the 886 commits was written by a person; the other 885 were written by the software. Authorship is the smaller story. The same person set the scope and made the decisions the software then built. Automated in the work, directed at the decisions, accountable for all of it.